1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant, the plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, respectively.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the facts is as follows, except for the cases where part of the basic facts is rewritten or added and deleted as follows, since the part of “1. Basic Facts” from No. 3, No. 10 to No. 5, No. 9 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as the part of “1. Basic Facts”.

An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

[Supplementary or additional or deleted parts] Section 11 and Section 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “instant hosting”) shall be deleted.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance has led to the joint purchase of encryptions in the AF hosting room (hereinafter referred to as “AF hosting room”) of Nos. 14 and 15 (hereinafter referred to as “AF hosting room”) with the name “N” as “the participation in, or led to, the joint purchase of encryptions” in the AF hosting room (hereinafter referred to as “AF hosting room”).

The 4th to 10th of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

【1) The Defendant was interested in the joint purchase of AI, and the Defendant came to know on May 22, 2018 that the AL, which was known to the Defendant on the same day, introduced AH company proceeding team to the Defendant, and the Defendant became aware that it could purchase AI from the AF hosting bank under the name of “AO” to which AJ belongs.

Since then, the defendant received a proposal from the AJ for the joint purchase of AI, and the contents of the proposal are as follows: "If the defendant gathers the amount of joint purchase equivalent to 2,00 or 3,000 Ghana (hereinafter "the above"), he can enter into a contract for the purchase of AI with AM venture capital company, a venture capital company, which has received encryptions from AH company, which has received encryptions from AH company, 100% in the event of a failure of purchase, and 1,380 AI (including 15% in the case of a failure of purchase)".

The defendant shared the above proposal in the coding room.

2. AE was a member of the cryptive hosting room, and the plaintiff is interested in the joint purchase of "AG" around May 23, 2018 and the defendant and AI.