logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.09 2013고단1371
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant, on July 1, 2009, entered into a contract with the Victim C and Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the construction period from August 1, 2009 to June 1, 2010, entered into a construction contract for a detached house (total floor area of 985.10mm2) with the construction cost as KRW 1.3 billion (Additional Amount and other construction cost) with the victim, and continued construction works with the advance payment for the construction payment from the victim. On April 2010, the dispute occurred in the process of settling the contract for construction work with the victim, as the victim was notified of the termination of the contract for construction work with the victim. In order to take over the construction cost from the victim, the Defendant attempted to exercise the right by forging the “Additional Amount and other construction cost” and the “additional construction cost statement” as follows.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On May 16, 2010, the Defendant forged an additional amount and a construction adjustment agreement shall pay the additional amount and construction adjustment agreement, and the additional amount and the unpaid amount of tax to B by using a computer in cash after obtaining approval for the use of the new construction project: Provided, That the Party A voluntarily affixed the seal of the victim who had been the Defendant at his/her own discretion in the name subsequent to the “C”, when it is unable to pay the said amount (one hundred thousand three hundred thousand three hundred thousand three hundred thousand won). The address (one thousand three hundred thousand won) on May 16, 2010: the Geumcheon-gu Seoul F, the resident number, G, the representative, contact number, H, and the address: D, the resident number: I, the representative, and contact number: B, and the seal of the victim who had been aware of the said amount at his/her discretion.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the additional amount and one copy of the construction contract, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the victim's name.

B. The Defendant forged additional construction specifications: “Additional construction specifications, construction name: Newly constructed E, construction order owner: C, construction officer: A, construction officer: 2nd floor mechanical parking machine construction, tunnel construction machine destruction, by process, using computers.

arrow