logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.24 2015가단50655
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 6, 2011, the Defendant: (a) concluded a lease contract with respect to the lease property of KRW 100,000,000 won; (b) the period from November 1, 2011 to October 31, 201; (c) extended the period of the said lease contract to KRW 841 square meters; (d) KRW 321 square meters on the above ground; and (e) KRW 364 square meters on the office of Pyeongtaek Plub roof office (hereinafter “instant leased real estate”); and (d) KRW 10,50,000,000 monthly rent (excluding value-added tax); and (e) paid the Plaintiff KRW 205,00,000,000,000 to KRW 505,000,000,000,000 (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”); and (e) agreed on KRW 205,505,005,000,000 (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”).

‘The instant payment order was finalized. D.

Based on the original copy of the instant payment order on September 4, 2015, the Plaintiff: (i) KRW 51,610,958 of the lease deposit under the instant lease agreement (i.e., KRW 50,000,000, and KRW 1,610,958 of the claims to be seized and collected from the provisional seizure to the seizure); (ii) the claims to be transferred to the provisional seizure; and (iii) the collection order of the Seoul Southern District Court KRW 2015,14833; hereinafter “the collection order of the instant case”).

(A) Upon receipt of the instant collection order, the instant collection order was served on September 7, 2015 to the Defendant, the garnishee. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (each of the entries and arguments included in the provisional number), the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The allegations and judgment of the parties

A. The plaintiff is subject to the collection order of this case.

arrow