A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 21, 2014, around 18:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main business operation by force by avoiding disturbance for about 25 minutes, and blocking the passage of customers who find the place by avoiding the disturbance, and obstructing the victim’s main business operation by force. The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, she was seated in the above stairs under the influence of alcohol, and she demanded that the victim and the victim’s son, who is a son, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, her part, she.

2. At around 18:40 on the same day, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant return home from the police officer G belonging to the Ethical Zone of the Ethical Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving 112 reports as to the above interference with his duties, and under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant expressed to the above G that “I am maz, governance White head, so I am ? because I am ? I am ? because I am ? I am ? I do not have any wrong head, so I am ? I am ? I am me ? because I am ? I do not have any wrong head, because I am ? I am am. I do not am am. I am. I am. I do not am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am. I am.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 declarations and arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the victim G was put to the left-hand side in need of medical treatment for about 10 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of C and G;

1. E statements;

1. Photographs of the persons concerned;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The conditions that are favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows.