A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 8, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong District Court’s House on January 8, 2016

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle B with the highest other car.

On June 12, 2020, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.163% among the blood transfusion around 13:23 on June 12, 2020, turned to the left at the center of Pyeongtaek-si, 39-1, and the front road of the NAF at the Round of the Round-ri market.

Since there is a place where a crosswalk is installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle by checking whether a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while negligent in driving the crosswalk as it is, shocked into the right side of the Defendant’s car by the victim C ( South, 78 years old) who crosses the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals.

As a result, even though the victim suffered an injury, such as the left-hand blue base, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, the defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures such as aiding the damaged person.

2. On June 12, 2020, the Defendant driven a vehicle with B low alcohol level of 0.163% while under the influence of alcohol level of around 2.7 km from the road front of Pyeongtaek-si, 51, Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, to the front day of the same city at approximately 2.7km.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A survey report on actual condition, on-site photograph, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and photographs of reported mobilization;

1. The principal driver;