1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of the part of the 5th to the 15th to the 6th 18th 18th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

“4) The Defendants alleged that the Defendant contributed to the injury of the instant case to F was 80% of the rate of contribution to the injury of the instant case, on the premise that F had been scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s

5) Conclusion, the amount of damages arising from the same cause as the health insurance benefits due to the instant accident is KRW 66,69,490 (i.e., the Plaintiff’s insurance benefits of KRW 13,324,820) (i.e., KRW 53,374,670), and the amount of damages in consideration of F’s fault ratio (40%) and contribution ratio (80%) and contribution ratio (80%) is KRW 8,003,938 (i.e., KRW 66,69,49,490 x 60% x 20%). Where the National Health Insurance Corporation provided insurance benefits to the insured or his/her dependent due to a third party’s act, it is subrogated to the third party’s right to claim damages within the limit of the expenses incurred in paying the benefits (Article 58(1) of the National Health Insurance Act that a person who received the insurance benefits from a third party is entitled to double compensation for the same cause.