logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정775
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2016, at around 07:15, the Defendant: (a) operated a vehicle on the part of the victim E, who is an instructor of a driving driving school, on the center of the median road located in C at the city of Jeju on April 30, 2016; (b) operated a one-day Vietnam apartment complex; (c) operated the Defendant’s Indian Tourist bus on the same side, the vehicle on which the victim was aboard, due to the driver’s failure to drive the driver, was waiting for the vehicle of the victim; and (d) was waiting for the signal at the said place.

Therefore, the injured person opened a driver's seat in the vehicle with a complaint against the defendant for the risk of the accident, and opened the breath of the victim's breath, and opened the breath to the floor by cutting the breath of the victim's breath, and followed several times.

As a result, the victim caused a scarcity of a scarcity, which requires two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, G, and H;

1. Report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (20 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant led to this Court in this Court, and that there is little aspect of inducing dispute with the defendant, such as the confession of the instant crime, and the victim's resistance to the tour bus driver's seat who is getting off from the teaching vehicle, etc., is somewhat favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim by cutting down the damaged person above the road surface and driving down the sway, etc. In light of the fact that the method of crime is dangerous and the victim is a third degree disabled person who can not use the left bridge due to brain disease, the nature of crime is poor. Nevertheless, the Defendant is the victim and the Defendant at the time.

arrow