beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 422,00 as well as 5% per annum from November 7, 2015 to August 11, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff paid interest of KRW 100,000,000 on August 6, 2010 to the Defendant and lent the amount to KRW 300,000 per month.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 50,00,000 among the Defendant around August 201, 201, KRW 10,000,000 on February 2, 2015, KRW 25,000,000 on August 6, 2015, and KRW 5,000 on August 8, 2015, and KRW 8,400,000 on September 5, 2015, but did not receive interest of KRW 50,00,00 on the principal from August 201 to September 5, 2015.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 23,900,000 including the total interest on the principal and loan unpaid to the plaintiff and the delayed payment damages therefor.
2. If there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment, or if the purport of the entire pleadings is added to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the reply to each of the response to the order to submit each of the financial transaction information to Gyeongnam Bank Co., Ltd. by this court, the plaintiff loaned to the defendant with interest of KRW 300,000 per month on August 6, 2010, and the fact that the defendant repaid 50,000,000 among them on November 9, 2010, the fact that the plaintiff has received all the remainder of the principal except for KRW 1,60,000,000, out of the remainder of the loans 50,000,000.
On the other hand, the defendant has a defense to the effect that the remaining principal was fully repaid and the interest was fully repaid from August 2011.
First of all, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendant is deemed to have paid the Plaintiff KRW 1,00,000 on January 10, 201, and KRW 600,000 on August 28, 2015, and the remainder KRW 1,600,000 on which the principal has been repaid.
With respect to the payment of KRW 600,000 on August 28, 2015, the Plaintiff received KRW 10,000 as interest for the loan of KRW 10,000,000 related to C, and the Plaintiff’s assertion is not accepted since there is no evidence to support this as the principal of the loan of this case.
Next, the Defendant’s interest on the instant loan is all.