The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below found the defendant guilty among the facts charged against the defendant on the ground that the crime of altering a private document, forging a private document other than the crime of uttering of a private document, and the crime of uttering of a private document is not guilty on the ground that " even if the defendant arbitrarily changed the entry of the part of the obligation to obey the middle of an employment contract under the name of E, such change shall be an alteration to the extent that it does not harm the identity of the existing document and shall not constitute the alteration of a private document, and shall not be deemed to constitute the Article of the private document." The court below acquitted the defendant on the same factual basis, and found the defendant guilty of the alteration of a private document and the uttering

However, in this case where only the defendant filed an appeal against the guilty portion, the aforementioned acquittal portion was excluded from the object of attack and defense between the parties because the prosecutor did not file an appeal, and the prosecutor did not specifically dispute this part, and thus, it does not seem to have any other matters to be deliberated and decided ex officio.

Therefore, this court did not re-examine and decide the defendant's acquittal part, and only the guilty part of the judgment of the court below shall be judged.

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) prepared and printed out the secondary employment contract (as the first written employment contract (as the investigation records No. 7, No. 8) that adds the repair repair obligation after retirement of E based on the said first employment contract (as the investigation records No. 23, No. 24 of the investigation records) under the condition that he/she should take overall charge of the production and management of the Defendant’s company’s website; and (c) completed and signed the two employment contracts (as the investigation records No. 23, No. 24 of the investigation records) under the circumstances that he/she should take charge of the repair and repair of the above website and server; and (d) it is found that there is any clerical error in