logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.09.01 2017고단2021
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

1. On May 19, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from a distance of about 1.5 kilometers from the front of the Gama Hospital, No. 20, 3, a 20-lane Do-si, Pyeongtaek-si, to the front of the pharmacy located north-ro 43, the same city, from around 1.5 kilometers to the front of the pharmacy located north-ro of the same city.

2. On May 19, 2017, at around 23:55, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license from a distance of approximately 1.5 kilometers from the front of the cU convenience store in Pyeongtaek-dong, Dong-dong to the front of the cU convenience store in the same city to the 1.5 kilometer underground street.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without any license;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a license ledger and a license ledger;

1. Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant had already been punished for driving without a license, and the Defendant has repeatedly committed the same kind of crime on the second month only without being aware of the history of such punishment.

In particular, it has been controlled two times a day or without licenses during this time.

Furthermore, the Defendant committed the instant crime within the period of repeated crime after having been sentenced to punishment for other crimes and having been released from prison.

However, the defendant is going to reflect misunderstanding in depth and not repeat again.

The actual accident did not lead to the actual accident.

The preceding previous conviction was only one case and was sentenced to a fine.

It may also be considered in favor of the person who supports the mother's living alone with the person's father who is living alone.

In addition, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered.

arrow