logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.21 2017고정676
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 12:50 on May 23, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 High 676,” operated by the Victim AC despite having no intent or ability to pay taxi charges in front of the Seo-gu Incheon AA and AB hospital.

AD taxi and operated 27 Samsan-gu Sports Center in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, a destination, as if the victim would normally pay the taxi charges, and then did not pay KRW 13,600,00 of the next taxi charges to the front.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 19:30 on October 7, 2016, “AG operated by the Victim AF in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; and (b) around 3, 2016, “AG’s GaG operated by the Victim AF of the Victim AF,” showed the attitude to pay the alcohol value in a normal manner; (c) orders such as drinking and drinking, etc.; (d) deceiving the victim by ordering the victim; and (e) by deceiving the victim, the victim was provided with 6 Macju and massage equivalent to the total market value of 42,00 won from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the property from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

On October 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 04:48, the main point of “AJ” operated by the victim AI in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on October 26, 2016; (b) stated that the Defendant would normally pay the alcohol value without any intention or ability to pay the alcohol value; and (c) stated that the Defendant had been provided with a siren of KRW 290,000 from the injured party with a siren of KRW 17 years from the market value.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the property from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 676"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. AC Statement;

1. "Receipt 2017 High 889";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. AF’s written statement “2017 high-level 928”;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the police against AI;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on damage receipts;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow