The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of lecture attendance order) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime.

The defendant has no record of being punished beyond a fine for the same crime.

The Defendant agreed with the victim C.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim G, I, J, and K is relatively weak.

Defendant

Driving vehicles are covered by comprehensive motor vehicle insurance.

On the other hand, while the defendant was running along the second line of the 4rd line at the 4rd line, he changed the vehicle line to the 3rd line, and the 520,000 won of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 4rd line of the 4rd line, and the 520,000 won of the 520,000 won of the 520,000 won of the 520,000 won of the 520,000 won of the 1st line of the 3rd line of the 4rd line of the 4rd line of the 5rd line of the 1st line of the 1st line of the 4rd line of the 1st line of the 3rd line of the 1st line of the 3rd line of the 1st line of the 2nd line of the 1st line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 2nd line of the 1st vehicle.

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was punished twice for a drinking crime, including the record of being punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking).

The defendant was unable to reach an agreement with the victims other than the victims C up to the trial of the party.

The lower court appears to have determined the sentence against the Defendant in full view of the above circumstances, and there is no change in the special sentencing conditions after the sentence of the lower judgment.

. The above.