logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.06.24 2014고단2880
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for six months, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Sungwon District Court's Sungnam branch on December 3, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 11, 2014.

On September 19, 2014, at around 22:30, the Defendant suffered from the shoulder with the victim D(the age of 32) on the front side of the C main office in Gwangju City, and caused the victim's face by drinking home, and caused the victim's face side by drinking home, and caused the victim's injury on the front side of the C main office in Gwangju City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Investigation report (F);

1. Records before and after judgments: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, previous records of dispositions, results of confirmation, and application of statutes of the judgment;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 39 (1) of the same Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: one month to ten years; and

2. Basic area (from April to June) of types of injury in general within the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria.

3. Determination of sentence: The sentence shall be determined like the order, taking into consideration all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the case, such as the fact that the defendant has led to the confession of and reflects against the crime in six months of imprisonment, the extent of damage to the victim seems to be considerably heavy, and the fact that the defendant does not make any effort to agree with the victim, and the fact that the defendant is a previous criminal

arrow