(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.10.11 2015가단115190

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.10.11 2015가단115190

물품대금

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. At the same time, 66,00,000 won is to be delivered from the Plaintiff to the five (5) teams below.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 원고는 2015. 4. 20. 피고로부터 캠핑 카라반 F-600 모델 5대를 1대에 13,200,000원, 합계 66,000,000원에 샀다.

B. From around that time, the Plaintiff used carra for business, and around July 12, 2015, a large number of five times of floodings occurred inside and returned accommodation expenses to the customer’s port.

Accordingly, upon the plaintiff's request, the defendant repaired on July 13, 2015, and the repair content was to the extent that the container was loaded between the window frame.

C. On July 18, 2015, a large number of rainers, once all five, have become unable to normally use flood.

Upon the plaintiff's request, the defendant re-acceptanced.

【Written Confirmation of Repair” (A 4 A)

7. The point of origin 27.

Above 7. 18

7. It will be between 27.

(d) At the end of July, 2015 and the beginning of August, 2015, a large amount of rain has been flooded to the extent that it can not be used for all five again. (e) The costs of repairing the five shall be the aggregate of KRW 15,180,000 (Evidence: Evidence: Gap 3,4,5, the result of the appraiser F’s appraisal, the purport of the entire pleadings, as follows:

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances are acknowledged as evidence as to whether a defect can not achieve the purpose of the contract due to the defect, i.e., (i) the cost of repairing the defect is 23% of the total product amount (15,180,000 ¡À6,000,000) and the consumer's demand for the repair of the defect from the beginning in the new product delivered, and (ii) the causes of water leakage are various, such as the defect in the construction of the actual container for the outer finishing of treatment, the defect in the creshing of the cresh, the defect in the construction of the cresh, the defect in the creshing, and the defect in the construction of the window. Since the five defects are all delivered by the plaintiff, there are no objective questions about the completeness and durability of the new product of the same model produced by the defendant, i.e., another kind of product that has no defect rather than the contract cancellation.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2018.09.18 2016가단10487

-대전지방법원천안지원 2019.02.13 2018가단110413

-의정부지방법원 2018.01.17 2017가단22124

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.08.21 2013고단456

-서울서부지방법원 2015.10.16 2014가단232602