A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, even though he was not authorized by C (State) to make endorsement on a promissory note under the name of C (State) above, did not have the authority to do so for the purpose of uttering. Around March 2009, the Defendant forged an endorsement, which is written in the column of endorser of a promissory note amounting to KRW 00431971 and the face value of KRW 30 million, in the column of endorser of a promissory note, at his own discretion, the Defendant: (a) signed each seal affixed by C (State) seal affixed by C (State) seal affixed by the Defendant at his own discretion, and forged an endorsement, which is written in the column of endorser of a promissory note, which amounts to KRW 30 million.

2. The Defendant: (a) delivered forged promissory notes to I (State) directors who may know of the fact that they were duly formed at the above time and place; and (b) exercised them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the decision on provisional seizure of claims, partner agreement, or promissory note;

1. Article 214 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime (the title to the securities) and Articles 217 and 214 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act, and the relationship between the defendant and the victim, and the circumstances leading to the defendant's crime of this case may be considered. However, the defendant did not agree with the victim or take any measures to recover from damage. The victim cannot be deemed to have any substantial damage to the victim because a claim of KRW 30 million is provisionally seized out of a claim for the return of a construction mutual-aid claim held against the Construction Mutual-Aid Association due to a forged promissory note of this case, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, conditions after the crime, etc. are considered.