logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.02.18 2015고단2688
근로기준법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence on October 26, 2015 to six months of imprisonment due to fraud, etc. in the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on November 26, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 3, 2015, and

Defendant 2, the 2015 Highest 2688, is the representative of G in the 407-Gu, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, who is a full-time employee and operates a communications business using six full-time employees.

The Defendant, while providing counseling at the place of business from June 15, 2015 to August 31, 2015, had retired workers H’ wage of 842,580 won in July 2015, was not paid within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline, and did not pay 4,169,031 won in total for two workers within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement on the extension of the payment deadline between the parties concerned.

"2015 Highest 3343"

1. On June 2015, the Defendant against the victim I can open only LG telecom with the victim in the “K” Kimpo-si’s agency operated by the victim I in the J of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the “G” operated by the customer to open the SK Telecom cell.

In order to open the SK Telecom cell phone, six mobile phone terminals for SK Telecom were opened at the face of the week and distributed the opening fees.

However, as the defendant had economic difficulties, the defendant intended to prepare money by receiving a mobile phone device and selling it to the exporter, and did not intend to sell the above mobile phone device to the customers, open the communication, and receive the fee and distribute it with the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, from the victim on June 1, 2015, paid KRW 1,067,00, KRW 3 in so far as jugal ju, Samsung Tallon, equivalent to KRW 957,00,00, around June 2, 2015, KRW 41 in Samsung Gal ju, equivalent to KRW 858,00,00, around June 8, 2015, KRW 6, in total, KRW 5,874,00 in Samsung Gal ju, equivalent to KRW 858,00.

arrow