Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant committed the Defendant from around 10:15 on June 26, 2014 to around 10:21 on the same day, on the street located in Ansan-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul-si, and on the street, on the ground that he was gleeped with the victim B while running his business on the street, he boomed the victim’s head collection by hand, flick up the victim’s head collection by hand, and flicked the victim’s head on the flower portion in his neighborhood, and flicked the victim’s head.

As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of approximately three weeks of treatment for the victim.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of Defendant B from around 10:15 on June 26, 2014 to around 10:21 on the same day, at the distance of the members of Ansan-si, Sinsan-si, and around 10:21 on the same day, when he was assaulted by the victim A while running his business on the street, he raised the victim’s head, raised the victim’s head, raised the victim’s head, raised the victim’s knife, knife the victim’s head by hand, knife the victim’s knife, face, and knife the victim’s head by hand, at the same place as

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as scarcity, tension, etc., in need of approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements (the Defendant A and his defense counsel did not contain the head of the Victim B above the chemical part, the head of the Victim B was fleeped, and the Defendant B and their defense counsel did not contain any fact when the victim’s face was taken by hand. However, in light of the consistent damage statement from each investigation agency of A and B to this court, witness’s statement, etc., the facts constituting the crime in the judgment can be sufficiently recognized. Thus, the Defendants and their defense counsel’s arguments are without merit (including self-defense that the Defendant and their defense counsel used to oppose the other party’s defense against the other party’s defense).

Even if there is a dispute involving mutual assault, the concept of self-defense is one of the continuous strikes in which both disputing investors repeat the attack and defense, and it is the concept of self-defense.