A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “D Gameland” game hall in the following cities:

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from January 7, 2016 to March 18, 2016, the Defendant installed a total of 100 games, such as 20 games in the said “D Gameland”, 30 games, 20 games in the “credit”, 20 games, and 30 games in the “scambling”, and exchanged them in cash by settling the relevant game scores as one won per point.

As a result, the defendant exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused, E, F, or G;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; 1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] [the grounds for sentencing under Article 48(1)2 of the Confiscation Criminal Act shall be sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months in consideration of the following: (a) there is no person who does not have any record of committing the same kind of crime [the decision of sentencing]; (b) there is no person who does not have any record of committing the same type of crime; and (c) there is a confession and rebuttal of the crime.