beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for three years, Defendant B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for three years, and a fine of one million won.
Defendant
B, C,.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B are concurrently operating 'J' on the second floor of the building located in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu, and Defendant C, Defendant D, and Victim K (29) are the president of the business in which the above J conducts the 'Sastm' business against women in the above J.
1. Defendants C, Defendant D, along with the victim L (38 tax), victim K, and victim M (38 tax) from February 22, 2017 to February 17:2, 2017, the said “J” hereinafter referred to as the “defens as described in paragraph 2,” and Defendant C lost the money equivalent to KRW 21 million, and Defendant D lost the money equivalent to KRW 9.9 million, respectively.
Defendant
C and Defendant D, from 17:40 to 18:00 on the same day, agreed to recover money lost by Defendant A and Defendant B as a result of the agreement on the issue of recovering money lost with Defendant A and Defendant B from the point of its location, etc., and thus, Defendant A requested the victims to return money, but the victims refused to do so, Defendant A corrected the entrance and exit of the above JJ, and the indictment stated in this part of the facts charged that “Defendant B, while accompanying each item of 70cm in length at that location, she created an atmosphere of fear and put each item above the spacif in the direction of the kter,” but the Defendants did not consistently citing or threatening Defendant B’s respective items.
In addition, from the time when the police was investigated twice by the victim K and L to this court, the victim M was not deemed to have committed a threat with each item of the Defendants from the time when the police was investigated to the time when it was investigated by the police.
The CCTV images at the scene of the instant crime are stated, and even based on CCTV images at the scene of the instant crime, the face of Defendant B’s use of the above title before the victims is not confirmed, and the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the aforementioned part of the facts charged, and thus, modified as above
Defendant
C The phrase “a card was put in time by J.”.