logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.08.27 2014고단3822
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the Republic of Korea.

1. Around 09:30 on June 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.189% without a vehicle driver’s license at a section of approximately 100 meters from the apartment parking lot of the Samyang apartment located in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, to the entrance of the second end, while driving the said vehicle.

2. On June 18, 2014, at around 09:30, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and proceeded from the second apartment site to the lower Hayang Fire Station; and (b) neglected to perform the duty to stop on the right side of the vehicle, and neglected to operate the steering gear, the Defendant received the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle driving ahead of the right side of the vehicle, which is owned by the victim G, who was parked on the left side of the direction by negligence, while driving the said vehicle at the right side of the vehicle, while driving the vehicle in direct, bypassing, and driving the vehicle at the right side of the direction, while driving the vehicle at the right side of the vehicle.

After all, the Defendant destroyed the above 130 vehicles so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 959,957 by occupational negligence as above, and damaged the above 919,730 vehicles so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 919,730.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, even though the owner of an automobile was prohibited from operating an automobile which was not mandatory insurance, operated the said nuwee vehicle that was not mandatory insurance at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A report on the oral statement of the driver;

arrow