The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Improper sentencing on the summary of reasons for appeal: The sentence of the court below (long-term 2 years of imprisonment, short-term 1 year and 6 months) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The lower court sentenced the Defendant, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant (the crime of this case was committed four times a year against the victim who is a middle school branch, and the relation, frequency and method of the crime was extremely bad in view of the relationship between the Defendant and the victim; the victim who is merely 13 years old as a result of the crime of this case was considered to have suffered a huge physical mental impulse and pain; there is no circumstance for the Defendant to make efforts to recover damage; the Defendant was not taken out from the victim; the Defendant was not taken several times due to larceny, etc. after the crime of this case; the Defendant was punished for sexual crimes; the Defendant was a juvenile under 16 years old who has not yet been properly established; the Defendant was punished for the crime of this case; there was no record of punishment for the crime of this case; the Defendant violated his wrong recognition of all the crimes; the Defendant was a larceny crime committed after the crime of this case, and the Defendant was finally mitigated from punishment for the crime of this case, which is the most favorable to the Defendant (the Defendant’s punishment of this case).

According to the results of the judgment before the judgment of the court below, according to the circumstance different from the circumstances, the defendant lacks awareness of suffering of the victim and attitude against it, family support base is not sufficient, and the result of the evaluation of the risk of recidivism (KORAS-G) is 20 points above the total point of 20 points, and the punishment imposed on the defendant as above is a legally possible sentencing range.