logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.09 2012고단5861
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 25, 2012, the Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) heard the victim's face while drinking alcohol at the "Eju store" located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 09:30 on May 25, 2012, the Defendants heard that the victim F (the age of 32) would be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the shore and the lower wall frame, which require approximately eight weeks of treatment.

2. 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행) 피고인들은 제1항 기재와 같은 일시ㆍ장소에서 피해자 G(여, 28세)이 위 F을 폭행하는 것을 말린다는 이유로, 피고인 A는 양손으로 피해자를 잡아 밀치고, 피고인 B는 주먹으로 피해자의 입술부근을 1회 때리고 발로 피해자의 다리를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly committed violence to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of F, H and G;

1. Protocol of each police statement of G, I, J, and K;

1. Determination on the issues of the damaged photograph, on-site photograph, and the death diagnosis report

1. As to the defendant A and the defense counsel's assertion

A. The summary of the argument is that Defendant A does not have the fact that Defendant A had the victim F with the victim F with the Oralone.

B. According to the Board F, H, G’s statement, damaged photographs, and field photographs, the fact that F was assaulted by Obabamer seems to be clear.

Defendant

The fact that A assaults F at the time is also clear.

However, F has consistently identified the defendant A as a person who has committed violence from investigative agencies to this court.

F is assaulted under the influence of alcohol at the time and is relatively accurate in the present situation.

arrow