A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a concern, was known to the victim B (n, 40 years of age) and about about 20 years.

On June 9, 2016, at around 13:00, the Defendant came to front of the victim’s residence of Daegu Dong-gu 114 Do 305, Daegu apartment house 114 Do 305, 2016. On the ground that the said victim did not open the password and open the door, the Defendant was able to get off the said digital escape with a watch, which is a dangerous object between preparation and preparation.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 369 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 369 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The court shall take into account the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the value of the property damaged by the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution and that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and that there is a record of criminal punishment several times by the defendant, the unfavorable circumstances of the defendant's age, sex, conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other various factors specified in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, and determine the punishment as ordered.