Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall, in using and managing a means of access, borrow or lend the means of access, or keep, deliver or distribute the means of access, in receiving, demanding or promising any compensation therefor.

On October 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a loan consultation by phone from a nameless person who misrepresented C Bank D D staff at the end of the B of the B B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the B of the purchase; and (b) received, or promised to receive, the means of access by delivering, demanding, or promising to receive, the means of payment by delivering, demand or promising, one check connected to the E-bank account (F) of the Defendant’s name to the above B of the B of the B of the purchase. In order to increase the credit point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol and attached materials of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's acknowledgement of the facts charged in this case late and reflects his mistake, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of offense.

However, in order to eradicate the so-called phishing crime, it is necessary to strictize the act of transmitting the means of access, and in this case, the actual fraudulent damage has occurred due to the means of access delivered by the defendant, and the defendant.