A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2016, the Defendant received a single-use injection device with approximately 0.2g philopon from I in the bus stop located in the first bus stop located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu P apartment on February 18, 2016.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he received philophones, which are a local mental medicine.

2. Medication of phiphones.

A. On February 25, 2016, around 18:20 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant drank approximately 0.1g of opon on a can coffee.

B. On April 1, 2016, around 12:00, the Defendant dice in a can with approximately 0.1g of philopon from the Defendant’s home toilet located in Namdong-gu, Incheon, and 204 Dong 401, and erophone into a coffee.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered philophones, which are a local mental medicine, twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to I;

1. A written appraisal of each drug;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (verification of the market price of mert cancer patients and calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., and Articles 60 (1) 2 and 4 (1) 1 and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc., and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant has been subject to criminal punishment 14 times more than 14 times, the fact that there have been a history of having been subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the reaction from the hair occurs in the hair, etc., considering the favorable circumstances, the fact that the crime is divided and reflected in the event that the appellate court has been pending at the same time, and the punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, including equity, when the case is pending at the appellate court.