logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.03.30 2018고합15
통신비밀보호법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and suspension of qualifications for one year.

However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that he found one of the following: (a) at the market price of the victim’s possession of the lost Y-A50K, he embezzled it with his own possession without undergoing necessary procedures, such as returning it to the victim, even though she acquired one of the cellular phone (M-A50K) on a 7-lane dys in front of the aftermathm of Geumsan-gu’s death at the early night.

2. No person who violates the Protection of Communications Secrets and who intrudes upon residence shall record or listen to conversations between others that are not open to the public;

In September 2016, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1 of the above, sought to check whether the victim D (V, 27 years of age) who came to know through the Gangwon branch, had a male-doctrine, was male-doctrine to the mobile phone acquired, as described in paragraph 1 of the above paragraph, received a set of flick cases, which called “a pressd,” which was an open door for the surveillance of companion animals, and tried to install a mobile phone at the victim’s home and listen to the victim’s private dialogues at the victim’s home, and listened to the victim’s dialogues.

A. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant entered the F building 301, which is the victim’s residence in Yansan-gu, Yancheon-gu, Seoul, with the permission of the victim, and the victim installed the cell phone with the “Ampid,” which is equipped with the “Ampid” column between the toilets, and listened to the conversation of the victim who was not disclosed from that time until February 2017.

B. On February 20, 2017, around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a door by dividing the victim’s residence password, which he/she became aware of, in order to verify whether the installed mobile phone properly takes action; and (b) invaded upon the victim’s residence.

(c)

On February 24, 2017, the defendant classified the victim's residence password in order to re- install the victim's residential area, such as the above-mentioned B around 11:00.

arrow