beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Details of the disposition
On August 2, 2015, the Plaintiff driven a BM5 LPLi car and proceeded one lane on the front road located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Metropolitan Government) at a supersection of the office building distance of Yeongdeungpo-gu. On August 2, 2015, the Plaintiff did not change the direction with direction direction, etc. and did not change the two lanes safely as the traffic situation of the front and rear left-way. On the part of the victim E (E, South, 30 years old) (E, 30 years old) who was living in normal driving in the two lanes, and received approximately three weeks of injury to the victim, such as salt and tension, which requires treatment for about two weeks in front of the road located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and changed the two lanes to the two lanes of the office building distance of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu. At the same time, the Plaintiff did not take measures such as damage to the injured passenger G (Y, 28 years old), and did not take measures as it did, at the same time, to cause damage to the victim, 2000.
(hereinafter “instant accident.” On October 28, 2015, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s driver’s license (class 1 common account) pursuant to Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act on the ground that the Plaintiff caused a traffic accident, resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury to the victims and did not take necessary measures, such as aiding the victims, etc.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on January 29, 2016, but was dismissed on March 15, 2016.
【Ground of recognition” without any dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleading as to legitimacy of the instant disposition 1) The plaintiff did not have the intention to escape at the time of the instant accident. 2) The plaintiff currently engages in health food counseling and distribution business, and the vehicle driving is essential for livelihood, and the plaintiff is sincere without any traffic accident or criminal punishment.