All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) the sentencing of the court below (the sentencing of the defendant: six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is deemed to be too uneasy and unfair.

판 단 이 사건 범행은 피고인들이 G, H, F과 합동하여, G 등으로 하여금 피해자 J에게 하룻밤을 더 재워달라고 해서 피해자의 집 안으로 들어가게 한 다음, 피해자가 출근하여 집을 비운 사이에 G가 열어 준 출입문을 통해 집안으로 들어가 피해자 소유의 현금 345만 원이 들어 있는 지갑을 절취한 것으로, 범행의 내용과 동기, 수단 및 방법 등에 비추어 볼 때 그 죄질이 좋지 않은 점, 현재까지도 피해자의 피해가 회복되지 않고 있는 점, 피고인 A는 동종 소년보호처분 전력이 다수 있는 점 등 피고인들에게 불리한 정상도 있다.

However, the victim's damage from the crime of this case is not much than 3,450,00 won, equity between the crime of this case and the crime of larceny, etc. of which the two-year suspended sentence was finalized on November 21, 2013, and the crime of this case against Defendant A at the same time, the court below ordered the Defendants to provide community service equivalent to probation and for a period of time, Defendant B has no criminal records, Defendant A has no special criminal records, Defendant A was sentenced to 10,000 won of imprisonment with prison labor and fine of 3,00,000 won for special larceny, etc. committed during the suspended sentence period at the Sung-nam branch of the Suwon District Court on September 26, 2014.

9. In light of the fact that the suspended sentence is deemed to be invalidated upon the confirmation of 29.2, the Defendants are relatively old, and the Defendants were juveniles at the time of the instant case, erroneous recognition and reflects, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to be too uneasible and unreasonable.

Thus, there is no reason to appeal against the Defendants by the prosecutor, and it is in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.