Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the fact that the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth, the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime of interference with and insult in contingency under the influence of alcohol, and most of the larceny damage were recovered.

However, the crime of this case, however, is committed by repeatedly destroying or destroying corrective devices to another person's office by taking account of all the factors such as Defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the crime of this case was committed by infringing upon another person's office by repeatedly destroying corrective devices at night; (b) the business was obstructed by avoiding disturbance at the sobry; or (c) the police officer sent out after receiving 112 a report by taking a bath to the police officer; (d) the nature of the crime is not good; (e) there was no agreement with the victims; (e) several times of punishment for the same crime; and (e) the crime of this case was committed without being aware of during the period of repeated offense

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.