(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.12 2020고정148

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.12 2020고정148

상해

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the Defendant she had come to 39-3, Daegu-gu, Seogu, Daegu-ro 39-3; (b) on the ground that the pet dog, which had been responsible for the production of the books, was able to grow up, and (c) caused the Defendant’s assault against the victim on the ground that she said her her her her rings, the Defendant her her she would be called “the liquor tax,” and that her her her rings, the Defendant her her she was fluenced by assaulting the victim on the victim’s right side side part and her arms, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment; (b) caused injury to the victim on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

2. Legal statement of the witness B;

3. Some statements made to the defendant in the police interrogation protocol.

4. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B by the police;

5. Each investigation report (as to the attachment of the data submitted by the suspect B, as to the statement of the 112 Report processing case and the confirmation of a recording file, etc. on the attachment of the data submitted by the suspect B [the defendant's statement is not related to the victim's failure to be injured or the defendant's act and the victim's injury, and the defendant's act constitutes legitimate defense or legitimate act as stated in its reasoning. However, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant's act was acknowledged to have inflicted injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning. Considering the developments, circumstances before and after the case, the degree of the victim's injury, etc., the defendant's act goes beyond the passive defensive act, it is difficult to view that it is reasonable in its means and method,

Therefore, the application of the law cannot be seen as a justifiable act that does not violate the current defense of a party or social norms to defend the current unfair infringement.

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment.

참조조문

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.07.20 2016고정788

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.02.16 2020고정202

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2021.01.05 2020고정159

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2021.01.13 2020고정804

-창원지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고정293