logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.10.22 2020고단2021
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 18,000,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 25, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on February 25, 2015, and a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for the same crime from the Jung-gu District Court’s Goyang Branch on March 31, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 01:30 on April 10, 2020, the Defendant driven a vehicle C with low alcohol level of at least 0.100% under the influence of alcohol level from about 4km section to the road near the Man-si 119 Safety Center in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si to Pan City.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of two Acts and subordinate statutes to two copies of the Defendant’s legal statement No. 112 Report No. 112 Report No. 1, the Defendant’s statement No. 112 Report No. 1, the Defendant’s statement No. 112 Report No. 1, the Defendant’s statement No. 1, the investigation report No. 1, the Defendant’s statement No. 1, the Defendant’s statement

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been sentenced to a fine twice due to the crime of drunk driving, he/she also committed the crime of drunk driving.

This is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant.

Defendant is recognized to commit crimes.

Although the defendant moved a substitute driver, not a drinking driver from the beginning, but a substitute driver was involved in the destination, due to a mistake in arrival at the destination, there are circumstances to consider the circumstances.

Although the defendant was sentenced to a punishment due to a different type of crime, and the repeated crime of this case was committed until the period of repeated crime expires almost, the crime of drinking driving did not have any record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence or heavier punishment.

This is.

arrow