beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition may be recognized by taking into account the respective entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (including paper numbers) and the overall purport of the pleadings.
Around 10:00 on March 25, 2010, the Defendant openly insulting the Plaintiff for about 50 minutes, including the insult of the c apartment management office, at the location where D, etc. is located, the head of the apartment management office, and for about 10:50 minutes, such as “C apartment” to the Plaintiff.
The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 300,000 as the Seogu District Court Branch No. 2010 High Court Branch Decision No. 2010 High Court Decision No. 4735 due to the above facts constituting the crime, and then requested formal trial and withdrawn it, and the above summary order was finalized.
나. 피고는 2012. 2. 13. 16:50경 C아파트에서, 관리사무소 직원 등 7명이 있는 가운데 원고와 말다툼을 하던 중 원고에게 “씨발자슥아, 씨발새끼 개새끼야, 너 이 씨발새끼가 좆도 아닌 씨발새끼가”라고 약 10분간 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 원고를 모욕하였다.
On June 13, 2012, the Seogu District Court sentenced the defendant to a fine of KRW 200,000 for the above criminal facts, and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
C. On September 3, 2012, around 12:45, the Defendant discovered that the Plaintiff was seated at the C Apartment Management Office, and took a bath that the Defendant could not put the Plaintiff into the house while entering the house.
Therefore, due to the loss caused by the Plaintiff’s 112 report, the Plaintiff sustained 4 times the Plaintiff’s face face, and caused the Plaintiff’s drafting by breathing breath, thereby causing a little tear.
The defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the above facts constituting the crime by the Seogu District Court Decision 2010 High Court Branch Decision 2010 High Court Decision 8434, and the defendant claimed formal trial against this order, but was sentenced to a fine of the same amount. The appellate court sentenced the defendant to a fine of KRW 500,000 on September 5, 2013. The above judgment around that time.