logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.11.04 2016고단973
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall provide non-commercial cars for transport for compensation.

1. Nevertheless, on December 24, 2015, the Defendant offered a private car for commercial transport at a charge of KRW 12,000 for a non-commercial car from the agricultural cooperative located in Leecheon-si to the Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si.

2. Nevertheless, on January 5, 2016, the Defendant offered private cars for commercial transport by using Bchip XG car, a private car, from the vicinity of the ancient village to the vicinity of the Ischeon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si Yacheon-si, and at 15,000 won, at a charge of KRW 15,00.

3. Nevertheless, around January 14:47, 2016, the Defendant provided a private car for compensation by using BluxG car, a private car, from the vicinity of the hydrocheon-si to the vicinity of the Leecheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. Each report on commercial transport services;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for perusal of register of automobiles

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting an offense, Articles 90 subparagraph 8 of the Passenger Transport Service Act and Article 81 (1) of the selection of a fine for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant had five or more times of the same crime; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; and (c) the video recording of the informant appears to be an occupation-oriented crime.

arrow