1. The plaintiffs against defendant E among the judgment of the court of first instance, including the claims extended or modified by this court.

1. The following facts within the scope of the inquiry of this Court shall be recognized by this Court as substantial or consistent with the records.

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the plaintiffs' claims for cancellation of ownership transfer registration (whether each ownership transfer registration is null and void since the agreement on division of inherited property is forged) and the claims for restitution of legal reserve against defendant E.

The Plaintiffs filed a claim against the Defendants for the cancellation registration of ownership transfer registration of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No. 3 on the ground that the agreement on division of inherited property has been invalidated or revoked in the first instance trial. The Plaintiffs asserted that (i) the agreement on division of inherited property was forged by Defendant E, (ii) the agreement on division of inherited property is invalid because there is no specific share of inheritance by Defendant E, and (iii) the agreement on division of inherited property was revoked by fraud or mistake, but all other arguments other than the assertion on the division of inherited property were withdrawn

The Plaintiffs filed a claim for the return of financial property against Defendant E by inheritance recovery, but was dismissed at the first instance, and the Plaintiffs and Defendant E did not file an appeal on this part.

The Plaintiffs filed a claim for the return of legal reserve of inheritance against Defendant E and Co-Defendant D in the first instance trial.

The first instance court dismissed the claim for the return of legal reserve of inheritance against the above D, and the plaintiffs did not appeal against this part.

The first instance court partly accepted the claim for the return of legal reserve of inheritance against Defendant E, and the Plaintiffs and Defendant E filed an appeal.

On the other hand, the plaintiffs extended the principal of the claim according to the result of the appraisal commission and changed the initial date of the damages for delay.

2. Basic facts

A. The deceased K (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on February 22, 2007.

At the time of death, the deceased's spouse was deceased on September 1, 201.