logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.05.14 2019가단9742
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. On September 16, 2018, around 00:36, the Plaintiffs alleged that the first fire occurred inside the bank of “G” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu (hereinafter “instant fire”). The Plaintiffs, who operated in an adjacent building, suffered damages corresponding to the amount stated in the purport of the claim due to the instant fire, and thus, the Defendant shall compensate the Plaintiffs for the damages.

2. Determination Gap evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and the overall purport of oral arguments are as follows: (i) around 00:36 September 16, 2018; (ii) around 12 commercial buildings around the area of "G", presumed to have first been destroyed by a fire that occurred inside the boundary of "G" located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (iii) as a result of fire-fighting erosion, a large number of shocks were identified from the electrical distribution line of the above G-gu, the fire-fighting type; (iv) according to the fire site investigation document prepared by the competent fire station, the possibility of leakage of rainwater from rain, the possibility of the outbreak by rainwater from the outer cable of the building, the possibility of the collapse of the electric wires above the building, but it was not clear that the Plaintiffs, at the time of the fire of this case, were actually responsible for the construction of the above G-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the lack of direct control and management of the remaining structures caused by fire.

arrow