Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for six months, one year of probation, and two hundred hours of community service) declared by the court below is too uneasy and unreasonable.
2. The instant crime committed by the Defendant: (a) was committed on the part of the Defendant’s left blue part of the victim’s blue part of the victim’s blue part in the course of driving between the said vehicle and the parked vehicle in order for the Defendant to stop the vehicle to deliver the flue; (b) the victim, who was crossing the road along the crosswalk, was faced with an injury requiring approximately 12 weeks medical treatment; and (c) the victim, who was in excess of the above, escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim’s rescue, and thus, the illegality of the act is serious.
In addition, considering the fact that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim so far and that the degree of injury suffered by the elderly victims is serious, it is necessary to punish the defendant significantly.
However, the defendant seems to have recognized the crime of this case and against his mistake.
Moreover, the Defendant stated that the police officer who returned to the scene of the crime after ten minutes after the occurrence of the instant accident was the driver of the accident.
This is the fact that the defendant deposited five million won for the victim in the court below, and the fact that the victim was in excess of the victim in the crime of this case is not due to the direct shock by the defendant's driving, but due to the shock of the defendant's left part part part of the defendant's elbbow. The victim suffered the serious injury as above has a partial impact on the victim's age, etc. The defendant subscribed to the liability insurance of this case, the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal history until now, and the defendant was a juvenile under the Juvenile Act at the time of the crime of this case.