logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2019.06.11 2019고정5
저작권법위반
Text

Each public prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A’s violation of the Copyright Act is the representative director of C and B, a corporation with office in Boh City D.

1) On November 22, 2017, the Defendant established a “F” program on six computers without the consent of the victim (owner)E at the said corporate office, and infringed copyright by reproducing it on the said corporate office. 2) The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, infringed on the copyright by installing a “H” program on five computers without the consent of the victim (owner)Gs.

B. The Defendants violated the Copyright Act by Defendant B and Defendant C, as the representative director, committed the act of violation as referred to in the above paragraph (a).

2. Determination

(a) An offense subject to victim's complaint: Articles 140, 141, and 136 (1) 1 of the Copyright Act;

B. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: Submission of a statement of withdrawal of complaint on April 12, 2019 to the effect that the victim's complainant's agent will revoke the complaint against the Defendants to this court on April 12, 2019

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow