logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.08.23 2016고단399
건축법위반등
Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be 6,000,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a building outside an urban area in violation of the Building Act shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province branch, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu, but the defendant

A. On January 2015, 2015, among the fourth-story buildings located in the area of 302.1 square meters in size of 302.1 square meters in a planned control area, 5 households, 3 households in the third-story, 4 households in the 302.1 square meters in a city planning management area, and 10 households in the aggregate as multi-family houses of 16 households in the total of 10 households in the 16-family houses by means of removing the door of a living room in the school with six households, and installing a boundary wall between households, and installing separate entrances, etc.

B. On January 2015, 2015, among the fourth-story buildings located in the area of 394.78 square meters in a planned management area, 5 households, 3 households in the 394.78 square meters in the 394 square meters and 3 households in the 394.78 square meters in each city, which are planned management areas, were substantially repaired into 10 multi-family houses of 16 households in total by installing a boundary wall between households which remove the door of a living room in the 6-school, and installing separate entrances in the 6-school, etc.

2. Violation of parking law;

A. Although the defendant should install a 0.7 parking lot per household for the multi-family house described in the above paragraph 1-A at the time and place described in the above paragraph 1-A, the defendant did not install five-fifths parking lots for the six households added by large-scale repair in the above method.

B. Although the defendant should install a parking lot of 0.7 units per household with respect to the multi-family house described in the above paragraph 1-A at the time and place described in the above paragraph 1-A, the defendant did not install five-fifths parking lots for the six households added by large-scale repair in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Current status of buildings in violation;

1. Reporting on the results of inspection of violations, such as substantial repair of the multi-family house, and each;

arrow