logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.19 2014고단1946
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-speed car B.

On January 25, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:20, and led to a four-lane road in front of the 134km of the west-gu Gyeong-gu Gyeongnam Highway along the direction of Busan along the three-lane road in the direction of Seoul.

It is an expressway and there was a duty of care to change the lane safely by taking into account whether there is a concern about hampering the normal traffic of other vehicles entering the direction of the change in the situation of the traffic of the front and rear direction in the event of the change of the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the lane from three lanes to two lanes. In order to avoid the collision with the vehicle driven by the Defendant, the victim C (the age of 43) who is driving along the two lanes, changed rapidly from two lanes to one lane, and immediately, in order to change the lane to the left side, the Defendant was negligent in driving the DK5 vehicle in close vicinity to one lane to the left side of the vehicle driven by the said victim, so as to avoid the collision with the vehicle driven by the said victim.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, escaped the victim E (V), who was on board the said K5 vehicle, suffered from various chlostal chlostal chlostal chlostal chlostals, such as a catal catf, in need of treatment for about three weeks, while the repair cost of KRW 3,630,416, such as the maintenance of the catus exchange, owned by the said K5 vehicle to the extent that the above catal mark Co., Ltd. was damaged, and immediately stopped the said k5 vehicle and escaped without taking necessary measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.

arrow