1. The Defendant: 18,614,873 won to Plaintiff A; 14,49,410 won to Plaintiff B; and each of the said money from November 15, 2018 to 20.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) D AWD car at around 10:30 on November 15, 2018 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)

) A driver’s license and driving the G Hospital, located in F in the West-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the front side of the G Hospital, traveling three lanes on the three-lane road of Do 3, Do Do 3, and shocked the rear part of the HA car stopped under the new subparagraph (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiffs, on board the driver’s seat and the chief lighting of a stopping vehicle, complained of the background and the convaluence, and received the hospital treatment. (2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 and 5, each entry and video (including cases with serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The defendant is liable for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case as the insurer of the vehicle because the plaintiffs sustained the injury due to the operation of the defendant vehicle to recognize liability.

2. The period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and where there is any change in statistical income during the monthly unit period, statistical income during the forward period shall be applied, and less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.

It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute or significant fact, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, each physical appraisal commissioned to and inquiry about I Hospital Head of this Court, the rule of experience and the purport of the whole pleadings

A. Plaintiff A’s personal data: The base income and maximum working age for Plaintiff A’s self-employed male, July 38 and July 16 at the time of the accident: The daily wage of an ordinary man in the urban area, the daily wage of the ordinary man, the daily loss of the loss of labor ability until he/she reaches the age of 65 is the remuneration for work.