logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고단3827
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

Defendant

A and Defendant C Co., Ltd. are punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000, Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,00, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the business entity C(main) and the business entity of manufacturing fume, which is located in the same place as the F-in-state, and the safety and health management manager for the employees belonging to each company.

Defendant

B is a person who is responsible for the safety and health management of his employees together with Defendant A as the factory site of the above C (State).

Defendant

C(P) The head office is set up in F at two weeks and is a legal entity that engages in the business of manufacturing telegraphs and drain fumes, using 108 full-time workers.

Defendant

D(State) is a legal entity that has its head office in F in both weeks and runs ready-mixed manufacturing business using 21 full-time workers.

1. A business owner of a joint criminal conduct (violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and death by occupational negligence) committed by Defendant A in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act shall, if workers are likely to be in danger when commencing driving a machine, check in advance necessary matters, such as working methods, protective devices, etc., and take necessary measures to prevent danger, and, if workers are likely to be in danger at the time of conducting maintenance, adjustment or other similar work, such as maintenance, maintenance, or other similar work of a machine or machine, the operation of the machine concerned shall be suspended unless there is any risk that the workers might be in danger;

Nevertheless, at around 15:10 on April 16, 2016, the Defendants conspired with the victim G (the 64 years of age) who is an employee of C (the 3rd) and had the victim G (the 64 years of age) take the work of fostering the utility pole mold, which was completed in the second period of the lower court that made the utility pole mold, and did not install protective devices in the passage between the 2nd period of the lower court and the 3rd period of the lower court, and the victim did not complete stop the operation of the 3rd period of the lower court without installing any cover.

arrow