logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.02.01 2015고단1497
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B as the director of the LAE division, the safety manager at the construction site of replacing the electricity board in G located in the Hanam-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gun F, which began from September 1, 2014, and Defendant A is a person who is engaged in the work of loading and unloading the electricity board replacing the electricity board using HAC-dong-dong construction equipment.

Defendant

B From around 09:00 on September 4, 2014, from around the above construction site, Defendant A operated the above carcracracs, and was engaged in an on-site safety management by leaving the above work site by Defendant A and the victim I (the victim I (the victim South and the 43 years old), who is an employee of the dispute resolution committee, on board the carcracs, and connecting the electricity board to the cracstrokes. In such a case, Defendant B was at the site safety manager, and was under the duty of care to manage the carcras in a safe manner, such as ordering the driver of the carcras to safely manipulate the cras, and taking measures to prevent the workers from falling into the floor. However, Defendant A and the victim did not leave the above work site and did not conduct on-site safety management.

Defendant

A, at the above date, at the above time and place, had the victim board the car crails as above, so in such cases, it has been confirmed that the worker aboard the car crails has been on board, and thereafter, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident that the passenger on board, such as operating the crails, from falling into the floor, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to prevent the accident that the passenger on board, such as the operation of the crails, does not fall into the floor, but the victim crads while working the crails while putting the cnas on the top of the cnas, while

As a result, the Defendants conspired to cause injury to the victim, such as a 12-day average flaverization complex, right flaverization, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1.With respect to I and J, respectively.

arrow