The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the penalty (2.5 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects his mistake in depth.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendant in collusion with A and used a certificate of deposit in the name of F, which is a private document regarding rights and obligations, and the nature of the crime is considerably poor in light of the method and content of the crime. Nevertheless, the defendant continued to commit the crime of this case at an investigative agency, the defendant has a history of being subject to suspended execution once of the crime of this case and one fine, there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that can be newly considered after the decision of the court below, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, including equity in sentencing with the same and similar incidents, age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.