Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2014, at the office of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association, the Defendant applied for data requested to disclose information to the association and perused it, and the victim D (the age of 61) who is a female representative of the association (the age of 61) requested the signature in the written confirmation, refused it, and caused the Defendant to inflict an injury on the victim, such as the shoulder and sprinking of the arms that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment by cutting down the left side and pushingping down the arms and cutting down the arms and cutting down the arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photographs of damaged photographs or CCTV images to be cut;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (to compileTV video data file);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's defense counsel's assertion of the defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act that does not go against the social rules because the defendant's act occurred in the process of blocking the part of the defendant's right to leave.

However, in light of the circumstances and before and after the instant crime, it is difficult to view that the means and method of the Defendant’s act of keeping the victim in mind is reasonable, or there was no other means than such act. Thus, the argument that the Defendant’s crime constitutes a justifiable act is without merit.