logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.02.22 2017가단8735
특정공유지분의분할 청구의 소
Text

1. The Plaintiff shall sell the C forest land 496m2 at an auction in Ansan-si, and the remainder after deducting the auction cost from the price.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff shares 26,500/39,00 and the Defendant shares 12,50/39,000 shares in the respective shares of 26,50/39,000.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant did not reach an agreement as to the method of partition of co-owned property.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence No. 1, and the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination:

A. According to the above acknowledged facts, the Plaintiff, as a co-owner of the land in this case, may claim a partition of the land in this case to the Defendant pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.

However, as seen above, the agreement on partition of co-owned property between the defendant and the co-owned property cannot be reached. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for partition of co-owned property on the land of this case

B. Co-owned property partition by one trial on the method of partition shall be, in principle, by the method of in-kind division as long as a rational partition can be made according to the shares of each co-owner. However, even if it is impossible in-kind division or it is possible in form, if the price might be reduced remarkably due to such act, it shall be done by the method of so-called payment division by ordering the auction of the co-owned property to divide the price.

The requirement that a "in-kind can not be divided" is not a physically strict interpretation, but it includes cases where it is difficult or inappropriate to divide the property in kind in light of the nature, location, area, utilization status, and the use value after the division.

It also includes cases where, even if a co-owner's co-owner's act of division in kind, the value of the portion to be owned by him/her is likely to be significantly reduced compared to the value of the share before the division in kind.

Therefore, it is possible to divide in kind formally.

(b)if any;

arrow