beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 13, 2016, at around 02:50, the Defendant discovered a person who was placed on the street before the entrance of the D convenience store in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and reported to 112. Upon receiving the Defendant’s 112 report, the police officer E of the Incheon National Police Agency sent to the site, who was urged to have the said person returned home, and tried to leave the site.
The Defendant does not provide a cab to a jun of a june Party E.
In this subsection, two vinyls containing coffees are added to the above convenience store, and the flusium E was put to the chest and bridge of the above flusium E.
“.....”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in handling civil petitions.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;
1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. According to the above evidence, according to the above evidence, it is recognized that the police who had been performing his duties, as shown in the judgment of the defendant, had a crypylyl chloride (E cryp) (E cryp) and consistently maintained from the investigative agency to the court of this Court, “two cryp of the defendant's frys to himself/herself and a bridge towards his/her chest and bridge.”
“Statement to the effect that the Defendant made a statement to the effect that it was “,” see the protocol of the police interrogation of the Defendant’s part of the Defendant’s statement during the course of the investigation (hereinafter referred to as “each of the following facts: (a) while there was a fact that the Defendant was crypylyl chloride to E at the time, the Defendant was on the bottom of E cryp, and was not toward the body of E cryp.
“Statement to the effect that the F made the statement to the effect that the F was sent together at the time, or the F’s statement to the effect that the F was present as a witness in this Court, and “The Defendant did not see the fact that the Defendant was satiscinyl chloride, but satisfined with the body of the e-bat and E satch,” and the said things were removed.