1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit of demurrer against the instant No. 1 and the lawsuit of confirmation of existence of the obligation. The first instance court dismissed the lawsuit of confirmation of existence of the obligation and accepted all of the lawsuit of objection to the claim.

In light of the fact that the defendant appealed part of the judgment of the court of first instance by stating that “the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked,” and that the defendant did not assert the part regarding the lawsuit for confirmation of existence of obligation, the defendant appealed only against the part concerning the lawsuit for objection among the judgment of the court of first instance.”

As such, the scope of this court's trial is limited to the claim objection lawsuit.

2. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the witness C's testimony of the court of first instance among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: the witness C's testimony of the court of first instance; the witness C's testimony of the court of first instance is as the witness C's testimony of the court of first instance; the fact inquiry of the law firm of the court of second instance with respect to the violation of Articles 6, 10 and 11 is as the "fact inquiry of the fact inquiry about the violation of the law firm of this court of first instance"; and the "C" of the 8th page 20 is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except where "C is deemed as "C

(However, the decision of the court of first instance that is excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court is not accepted). 3. Then, the plaintiffs' objection suit against the defendant is accepted in its entirety on the grounds that it is reasonable, and the decision of the court of first instance is just, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all of the defendants' appeals.