1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part as to the Defendant Acceptance Intervenor by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the Appointed Party D, E, F, G, H, I, and J

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is the shopping mall of this case, which is the 7th underground and the 16th ground building located in Jung-gu, Seoul.

A) A former management service provider. Around February 21, 2009, the Defendant’s acquisition intervenor is a management body under the Act on the Management and Ownership of Aggregate Buildings established by a management body body organized by all sectional owners of the shopping mall of this case. (2) The Plaintiffs are sectional owners of the shopping mall of this case.

B. On September 16, 2008, N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”) (the owner of the instant shopping mall) issued a registration certificate for the establishment of a superstore with respect to the instant shopping mall on September 16, 2008 and managed the instant shopping mall by July 2009.

C. Around May 12, 2009, the Defendant underwriting intervenor established an O (hereinafter “O”) for the purpose of managing and operating the shopping mall of this case. A corporation, while managing the shopping mall of this case, was transferred the status as a superstore operator from N and registered as a superstore operator on April 22, 201. On September 4, 2013, the Defendant accepted the registration by reporting it to the head of the Seoul mid-gu Large-scale Store operator with the consent of at least 2/3 of the occupant occupants.

On November 14, 2010, the Defendant entered into a contract for the shopping mall management of this case with respect to the instant shopping mall with the content that the contract amount is 215,90,000 won per month, and the contract period from November 14, 2010 to November 13, 2012. The Defendant changed the contract period from November 9, 2012 to November 254, 207, 973,000 won per month, and the contract period from November 14, 2012 to November 13, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant service contract”) e.

On the other hand, the Defendant entered into a contract on the assignment of claims with the Defendant’s Intervenor (hereinafter “instant contract on the assignment of claims”) as follows:

In February 28, 2012, Article 1 (Purpose) of the former (A: Defendant and Defendant Intervenor: Defendant Intervenor) of the Act on February 28, 201, Article 1 (Purpose) of the Act on February 28, 201.