Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The defendant's employee visited the plaintiff's house on December 21, 2012 and installed the Internet and wire telephone provided by KT, and entered into cable broadcasting contracts with B, who actually referred to as the plaintiff's agent, has no dispute.
Plaintiff’s assertion
At the time of the establishment of the Internet and the conclusion of the cable broadcasting contract, there was only B, and there was no plaintiff.
B arbitrarily concluded a cable broadcasting contract under the name of the Plaintiff without obtaining the consent of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff did not hear an explanation regarding the conclusion of cable broadcasting contract from the Defendant or receive a duplicate of the cable broadcasting contract. Therefore, it cannot be deemed that a cable broadcasting contract was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.
According to the purport of evidence No. 1 and the whole arguments, on December 20, 2012, prior to the date when a cable broadcasting contract is concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant, the defendant explained the contents, expenses, period, and penalty for breach of contract of the said cable broadcasting contract in the currency with the plaintiff on December 20, 2012, and the defendant's employee visited the plaintiff on the following day to conclude a cable broadcasting contract and to establish the Internet, and the plaintiff asked that the plaintiff will be in the house on his/her behalf, and the following fact is recognized that B entered into a cable broadcasting contract with the defendant with the name of the customer of the cable broadcasting contract as the plaintiff.
According to the above facts, B has the authority to conclude the cable broadcasting contract with the Plaintiff on behalf of the Defendant, so it cannot be deemed that the cable broadcasting contract was duly concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and whether the copy of the contract was delivered or not has any particular impact on the formation of the contract.
The plaintiff's claim for the decision is dismissed as it is without merit.