logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.08.09 2017재나24
위임(임시)목사 청빙청원허락 무효 확인소
Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. The following facts are apparent in records:

The Plaintiff merged with the Defendant, as the 2015 Daegu District Court Branch 2015 ice ice ice 201, ① the Diplomatic Association that the Plaintiff served as the 50 pastor (the Defendant is a church that is merged with the E church) and the E church that the Plaintiff served as the 50 pastor, ② the resolution of the 8th Council on December 2, 2007 and the resolution of the 8th Council on December 25, 2007 to invite C to the 7th Council members of the merged church (the above resolution of the 8th Council and the church members' ice 2001). Since the 8th Council members' ice ice 2000 and the 8th Council members' ice 6th Council members' ice 30, the 8th Council members' ice 200, which was not the 5th Council members' ice 20, the 8th Council members' joint resolution on the 8th Council members' rally and the 5th Council members's petition.

As to this, the first instance court did not regard the instant ice ice resolution as having been conducted without the actual resolution at the direct meeting and the party meeting, and the mere fact that the order of the resolution at the direct meeting and the party meeting was changed, as alleged by the Plaintiff, was changed.

arrow